| Results |
|---|
| Number of records in this query: | 427 |
|---|
| Total records in survey: | 427 |
|---|
| Percentage of total: | 100.00% |
|---|
| Field summary for Q1 |
|---|
| Are you familiar with the existing mechanisms for peer-review of nuclear regulatory authorities, such as the IRRS missions? |
|---|
| Answer
| Count |
Percentage |
| Yes (A1)
|
191
| 44.73% |
| No (A2)
|
167
| 39.11% |
| No answer
|
9
| 2.11% |
| Not completed or Not displayed
|
60
| 14.05% |
 |
| Field summary for Q2 |
|---|
| Do you think that peer reviews of regulatory authorities should include also a quantitative assessment of the extent to which the requirements and expectations in GSR Part 1 are met? |
|---|
| Answer
| Count |
Percentage |
| Yes (A1)
|
250
| 58.55% |
| No (A2)
|
45
| 10.54% |
| No answer
|
13
| 3.04% |
| Not completed or Not displayed
|
119
| 27.87% |
 |
| Field summary for Q3 |
|---|
| Should regulatory authorities assign a quantitative score or grade to themselves when performing self-assessments against the expectations set in international standards such as GSR Part 1? |
|---|
| Answer
| Count |
Percentage |
| Yes (A1)
|
219
| 51.29% |
| No (A2)
|
69
| 16.16% |
| No answer
|
2
| 0.47% |
| Not completed or Not displayed
|
137
| 32.08% |
 |
| Field summary for Q4 |
|---|
| Have you ever been involved in a peer review of a nuclear regulatory authority, either as a reviewer or as a counterpart? |
|---|
| Answer
| Count |
Percentage |
| Yes (A1)
|
121
| 28.34% |
| No (A2)
|
165
| 38.64% |
| No answer
|
2
| 0.47% |
| Not completed or Not displayed
|
139
| 32.55% |
 |
| Field summary for Q5 |
|---|
| Are you familiar with the requirements and expectations outlined in the IAEA GSR Part 1 standard? |
|---|
| Answer
| Count |
Percentage |
| Yes (A1)
|
163
| 38.17% |
| No (A2)
|
117
| 27.40% |
| No answer
|
3
| 0.70% |
| Not completed or Not displayed
|
144
| 33.72% |
 |
| Field summary for Q6 |
|---|
| Should nuclear regulatory authorities use a rating system similar to the one used by INPO for organizations operating nuclear power plants? |
|---|
| Answer
| Count |
Percentage |
| Yes (A1)
|
150
| 35.13% |
| No (A2)
|
36
| 8.43% |
| I am not familiar with the rating system used by INPO (A3)
|
92
| 21.55% |
| No answer
|
1
| 0.23% |
| Not completed or Not displayed
|
148
| 34.66% |
 |
| Field summary for Q7 |
|---|
| If a quantitative assessment is provided, what rating system or scale should be used to express the outcome? |
|---|
| Answer
| Count |
Percentage |
| A grading with marks like 1 to 5, with 1 for excellence and 5 for very poor performance (A1)
|
130
| 30.44% |
| A grading with marks like 1 to 10, with 1 for excellence and 10 for very poor performance (A2)
|
68
| 15.93% |
| A grading system other than the above options (A3)
|
37
| 8.67% |
| No grading / scoring system should be used (A4)
|
40
| 9.37% |
| Comments
|
58
| 13.58% |
| No answer
|
1
| 0.23% |
| Not completed or Not displayed
|
151
| 35.36% |
 |
|