Please wait ...
0%
Survey on regulatory peer reviews with quantitative assessments
Total records in survey : 262

Results
Number of records in this query:427
Total records in survey:427
Percentage of total:100.00%
Field summary for Q1
Are you familiar with the existing mechanisms for peer-review of nuclear regulatory authorities, such as the IRRS missions?
Answer Count Percentage
Yes (A1) 191 44.73%  
No (A2) 167 39.11%  
No answer 9 2.11%  
Not completed or Not displayed 60 14.05%  

Field summary for Q2
Do you think that peer reviews of regulatory authorities should include also a quantitative assessment of the extent to which the requirements and expectations in GSR Part 1 are met?
Answer Count Percentage
Yes (A1) 250 58.55%  
No (A2) 45 10.54%  
No answer 13 3.04%  
Not completed or Not displayed 119 27.87%  

Field summary for Q3
Should regulatory authorities assign a quantitative score or grade to themselves when performing self-assessments against the expectations set in international standards such as GSR Part 1?
Answer Count Percentage
Yes (A1) 219 51.29%  
No (A2) 69 16.16%  
No answer 2 0.47%  
Not completed or Not displayed 137 32.08%  

Field summary for Q4
Have you ever been involved in a peer review of a nuclear regulatory authority, either as a reviewer or as a counterpart?
Answer Count Percentage
Yes (A1) 121 28.34%  
No (A2) 165 38.64%  
No answer 2 0.47%  
Not completed or Not displayed 139 32.55%  

Field summary for Q5
Are you familiar with the requirements and expectations outlined in the IAEA GSR Part 1 standard?
Answer Count Percentage
Yes (A1) 163 38.17%  
No (A2) 117 27.40%  
No answer 3 0.70%  
Not completed or Not displayed 144 33.72%  

Field summary for Q6
Should nuclear regulatory authorities use a rating system similar to the one used by INPO for organizations operating nuclear power plants? 
Answer Count Percentage
Yes (A1) 150 35.13%  
No (A2) 36 8.43%  
I am not familiar with the rating system used by INPO (A3) 92 21.55%  
No answer 1 0.23%  
Not completed or Not displayed 148 34.66%  

Field summary for Q7
If a quantitative assessment is provided, what rating system or scale should be used to express the outcome?
Answer Count Percentage
A grading with marks like 1 to 5, with 1 for excellence and 5 for very poor performance (A1) 130 30.44%  
A grading with marks like 1 to 10, with 1 for excellence and 10 for very poor performance (A2) 68 15.93%  
A grading system other than the above options (A3) 37 8.67%  
No grading / scoring system should be used (A4) 40 9.37%  
Comments 58 13.58%  
No answer 1 0.23%  
Not completed or Not displayed 151 35.36%